Rigol Vs Hantek, I would always prefer a Keysight, Tektronix

Rigol Vs Hantek, I would always prefer a Keysight, Tektronix or Rohde&Schwarz over the Hantek/Siglents/Rigol trio. Hantek DSO5202P vs. You can hate Hantek, but don't talk nonsense. Rich, thank you, I was looking at that very Rigol unit. Das alleine würde mir schon als Grund reichen The side-by-side comparison of the Hantek DSO5202P and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes’ specifications. Also Hantek is not exactly known for high quality construction and bug-free firmware of their scopes. The Hantek usually seems to get the edge over the Rigol simply due to that large price difference, although nobody actually disparages the Rigol. The side-by-side comparison of the Rigol DS1054Z and Hantek DSO5102P oscilloscopes’ specifications. We compile the list of most popular comparisons based on the comparisons that were made on our site. [2] RIGOL's line of products includes digital oscilloscopes, RF spectrum analyzers, digital multimeters EEVblog Captcha We have seen a lot of robot like traffic coming from your IP range, please confirm you're not a robot Author Topic: Which oscilloscope to choose hantek dso4102c, hantek dso5202p or rigol ds1054z? (Read 15384 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. The UPO1102 also has protocol decoders that are missing from the lesser model (the Hantek, of course, inculdes this), non-interleaved sampling and a deeper memory than the Hantek (and Rigol). 🏷️ Oscilloscope Deals on Amazon ⭐⭐⭐⭐ The Hantek gives you 100 MHz The Rigol has four channels and a larger screen, but costs 40% more ($260 vs $420) than the Hantek. Tektronix TDS 360 vs. Nov 21, 2025 · The Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1054Z are two very popular entry-level bench oscilloscopes, but they serve slightly different needs. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Hantek DSO5102P, Rigol DS1052E and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes. Author Topic: UNI-T UTD 2102CEX II vs Hantek dso2d15 what should i buy (Read 1962 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Zastanawiam się nad wyborem oscyloskopu na początek Rigol DS1054Z z 4 kanałami i 50 MHz czy Hantek DSO5102BM z 2 kanałami i 100 MHz? Jakie parametry są kluczowe dla amatorskiej elektroniki i elektroniki samochodowej? I have a Rigol 1054Z but recently the Rigol DHO800 series was announced/came out (12 bit ADC, USB-C powered, …). The only other experience is the battered and old analogue scopes I used when I did A-level Electronics 25 years ago! The Hantek is much more usable than they were and it's tiny, light and has a bigger screen compared to those old behemoths. The comparisons help with choosing between the newest and most popular oscilloscopes. However, it's fairly safe to say that Hantek DSO5202P is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its 50+ reviews. The input signal and mask settings differ from what is demonstrated on the Keysight. Owon HDS272S Rigol DS1102Z-E Hanmatek DOS1102 Rigol MSO5354 Peaktech P 1404 Hanmatek HO52 Peaktech 1401 Miniware DS213 Xeast ‎ZT702S Dollatek Mini-Oszilloskop mehr anzeigen Oszilloskope-Kaufberatung: So wählen Sie das richtige Produkt aus dem obigen Oszilloskope Test oder Vergleich Wie hat sich der Oszillograph zum digitalen Oszilloskop It is true that on the horizontal scale the Hantek can show a smaller step size, where the Rigol can do so in the vertical scale. I'm so grateful to all of you, at least I made one decision to take an oscilloscope with 4 channels so I need to make a decision between these Siglent SDS1104X-U vs. EEVblog Captcha We have seen a lot of robot like traffic coming from your IP range, please confirm you're not a robot EEVblog Captcha We have seen a lot of robot like traffic coming from your IP range, please confirm you're not a robot The side-by-side comparison of the Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1102E oscilloscopes’ specifications. Jun 17, 2023 · Author Topic: Rigol DS1052 or Hantek DSO-5072? (Read 2319 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Rigol DS1054Z is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its 100+ reviews. (rufus) 2015-04-15 09:49 Markus H. So Rigol DS1054Z, while being a cheaper option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $689 Hantek DSO4254C, as seen on the chart below. The size, build, and price of the following products vary a lot, which is clear proof that the manufacturer continues to try its best to provide users with the most effective tools. In this video you can see FNIRSI 1014D vs OWON SDS1104 vs Hantek DSO2D10 analyzed in 10 different parameters who will be the winner?Find out more about th Re: Kaufberatung RIGOL DS1102Z-E oder Hantek DSO5102P von Ardruido Consultant (Gast) 2022-05-31 09:37 Rigol stellt auch richtige Scopes her, Hantek nur so low-budget Bastler Kram. I kind of like the black trend, except I like everything to match so I hate that it will cause my bench to be a mix of colors. Check out the updated comparison guide of these oscilloscopes. Same screen size for all models. The vertical scale starts at 10mV/div vs. Re: Rigol 1054Z vs. Rigol DS1054Z (Read 7377 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Rigol is also good, small FFT size but if you don’t care about that it shouldn’t disappoint you. Im on a budget but im willing to spend ONLY if its worth it. ru/catalog/oscilloscopes_digital/TSifrovoj_ostsillograf_RIGOL_DS1104Z_4_kanala_kh_100_MGts/ и Hantek DSO5102P http: The side-by-side comparison of the Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes’ specifications. 2mV/div on the Hantek. Compare the features, performance, and user experiences of these two popular oscilloscope brands to determine which one is better suited for your needs. So Rigol DS1102E tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Hantek DSO5102P, as seen on the chart below. to/3Vjl7Azmore The UI for that does seem bizarre. my currect scopes are Tektronix 2236 and TDS380. Zastanawiam się nad wyborem taniego oscyloskopu HANTEK 6022BE, Voltcraft DSO-2020, Siglent SDS1022DL czy Rigol DS1052e. So please help me with this i think i have narrowed it down to either the Rigol DS1054Z (or a different model, better model) and the Hantek DSO3254A, but am still open to other suggestions. It's also worth mentioning that the $647 alternative This helps support the channel at no extra cost to you. The UI for that does seem bizarre. . SDS1104X-E 100MHz don't understand the difference :) RIGOL 4-Channel 50MHz Digital Oscilloscope (DS1054Z). Then Hantek, then FNIRSI. Explore the debate between Siglent and Hantek oscilloscopes in our informative blog post. It's also worth mentioning that the $379 alternative The side-by-side comparison of the Rigol DS1202CA and Hantek DSO4102C oscilloscopes’ specifications. Oscilloscopes produced by Rigol are diverse. Deciding Between Siglent and Rigol Oscilloscopes? Find Out Which One Is Better for You With This Comprehensive Comparison. The company has over 500 employees and more than 493 patents. Выбор в настоящее время стоит между RIGOL DS1104Z https://supereyes. For mainly digital stuff I can recommend a (Saleae-clone) 24 MHz 8 ch logic analyzers for 10-20 bucks . On top of that, it's fairly safe to say that Rigol DS1054Z is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its reviews. However, it's fairly safe to say that Hantek DSO5102P is a more popular oscilloscope, based on its 100+ reviews. i think i have narrowed it down to either the Rigol DS1054Z (or a different model, better model) and the Hantek DSO3254A, but am still open to other suggestions. 🏷️ Oscilloscope Deals on Amazon ⭐⭐⭐⭐ The Hantek gives you 100 MHz Author Topic: Hantek DSO5202P vs. to/4cn5nCI Hantek DSO2D15 : https://amzn. Który model lepiej sprawdzi się w analizie FFT do 1 MHz? That publicity is from an independent seller and not from Hantek. I frequently modify my meters to have a different color background so I will probably do the same for this one. As far as I know, all of them should be at least 100 MHz, Rigol could be hacked to >100 MHz, Hantek to 200 MHz (if 60 -> 200 MHz hack is possible, is it?). I mean I am the idiot who bought the Hantek despite knowing better (or at least I thought I knew better, maybe I am even dumber than I think) so maybe don’t take my opinions seriously. Da ist ein Wandler eingebaut, der --als ein Chip-- aus vier mit 250 MS/s spezifizierten Wandlern besteht und völlig The side-by-side comparison of the Hantek 6022BE and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes’ specifications. Relative keywords best digital oscilloscope 2026, top 5 oscilloscopes, digital oscilloscope review, Rigol DHO804 vs DS1054Z, Siglent EEVblog Captcha We have seen a lot of robot like traffic coming from your IP range, please confirm you're not a robot So Rigol DS1054Z tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than Hantek DSO5102P, as seen on the chart below. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1102E oscilloscopes. The Hantek DSO5102P and Rigol DS1054Z are two very popular entry-level bench oscilloscopes, but they serve slightly different needs. It has 2 input channels which is common number for entry level scopes, but of course, good enough for most electronics beginners or hobbyists. The Hantek DSO5102P features a bandwidth of 100 MHz and a sample rate of 1 GSa/s. The Rigol is a 4ch scope, that Hantek is only 2ch. EEVblog Captcha We have seen a lot of robot like traffic coming from your IP range, please confirm you're not a robot Hacked Rigol 1054Z (100MHz), Hantek 2C10 or 5102 the usual suspects, they will all work great. I agree the light blue display looks terrible against the black. If I would have to choose from the last three, I’d go with the Rigols. RIGOL Technologies, or RIGOL, is a Chinese manufacturer of electronic test equipment. Im debating on which one to buy, the Hantek MSO5074FG or the Rigol DS1074Z or Rigol DS1074Z-S. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Hantek 6022BE and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes. Rigol DS1054Z vs Siglent SDS1104X-E. F. Subscribed 221 23K views 1 year ago US: FNIRSI 1014D : https://amzn. Siglent and Rigol are slightly better but it may still take years before all the bugs get fixed. For anyone confused about Subscribed 221 23K views 1 year ago US: FNIRSI 1014D : https://amzn. [3] Currently, it has offices in Cleveland, Ohio; Beaverton, Oregon; Munich, Germany; in addition to its headquarters in Beijing, China. 8Mpts on the Hantek. When cost is removed from the equation the Rigol seems to be more preferable. to/3Vjl7Azmore If I was in the market for an oscilloscope today I would probably buy the Hantek DSO2C10 / DSO2D15 or the Rigol DS1102 . The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Rigol DS1202CA and Hantek DSO4102C oscilloscopes. These brands offer options tailored to hobbyists and professionals looking for essential functionality without breaking the bank. Jan 15, 2025 · Siglent vs Rigol vs Hantek – A Detailed Comparison of Leading Oscilloscope Brands [2026] When shopping for a reliable and budget-friendly oscilloscope, models from Hantek, Rigol, and Siglent stand out. MSO5074FG spec: 4 channels, 70MHz bandwidth, 8 channel logic analyzer, 2 channel 25MHz function Author Topic: Hantek DSO5102 vs Rigol DS1102 vs Rigol DS1054 (Read 28518 times) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. You decide what’s more important for you, since they all are a few bucks above your current budget. Rigol DS1054Z ,Electronic Engineer Discuss 1) Rigol DS1052E 2) Hantek DSO5062B / Tekway DST1062B (they should be equal in HW, right?) 3) Owon SDS7102 Rigol costs here almost same like Owon, while Hantek is a little more expensive. Hantek/Tekway DSO5072P von Rufus Τ. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Hantek DSO5202P and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes. So Rigol DS1102E, while being a pricier option, tends to get more favorable ⭐ reviews than the $437 Hantek DSO5202P, as seen on the chart below. Anyone who mentions Fnirsi 1014D and Hantek DSO2000 in the same sentence has no idea what he's talking about. schrieb: > Im Rigol sind fünf auf 40kSamples/s spezifizierte Chips eingebaut und > werden mit 100 kS/s betrieben Nein. This allows the Hantek and Rigol to show more detail in the horizontal and vertical directions respectively. If you activate all the options on the Rigol, you will get a lot more capable scope and probably for less money than the Hantek to boot. Thank you again Rich, I just ordered the Rigol DS1202Z-E, the 200 Mhz version from TEquipment, a licensed US The side-by-side comparison of the Hantek DSO5102P, Rigol DS1052E and Rigol DS1054Z oscilloscopes’ specifications. The Rigol DS1054Z is the only 4-channel scope specifically recommended in the wiki, but the guy from EEVblog says you'd be crazy to buy it, now that the DHO800 line is coming out: The Hantek is known for being a little noisy (which appears to come from the screen and isn't improved by additional PSU filtering). That alone would be enough to decide between these two. The comparison table makes it easier to choose between the Rigol DS1054Z and Hantek DSO5102P oscilloscopes. OWON HDS2202S costs at least $100 more than the DSO2000 and has 8kpts memory vs. Where you start bumping into their limitations is when you need a spectrum analyzer, reasonably precise and quick FFT and so on. . Read it now to know more. The Rigol has a mask feature with adjustable horizontal and vertical excursion around an input signal as demonstrated below. I would leave Owon and Hantek in the shop because they are riddled with bugs which never get fixed. jqdw, cgicl, bjr0, 80cke, ccsp, yygdbj, bdm4, blop, tpwncj, g8kqq,